Old Forum Archivist Posted November 27, 2009 Posted November 27, 2009 WAsP over-estimates AEP in the urban environment, i.e. actual production is nearer 3/4 of the WAsP result. Are there any tricks learned to correct for this ? e.g. I've tried increasing roughness and obstacles with limited success. Perhaps the urban area should be included as an increased height of orography ? Would it be appropriate to consider the city (turbine on edge of) in terms of displacement (like WAsP in the forest) ?--------
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now