YOCUI Posted October 21, 2013 Posted October 21, 2013 Hi wasp expert,i am comparing wasp predicted profile at mast location with measured profile at several costal projects , to search for a rule of thumb to decide the location of roughness change line from sea to land . i find six projects , all masts have a distance to sea around hundrads of meters . all 6 sites with very flat terrain , and roughness length change is low no forests , no obstacles. if i locate the sea-land roughness line according to the reality,( means the mast is located within land area about hundards meters away from sealand roughness change line ) than all 6 six predicted profile is very bad , with only one intersection point with the measured profile indicate only self point prediction is ok .( mast measurement height 30m 50m 70m/80m use the highest level for calculation full year data )but if i extend the sea-land roughness change line to cover the mast ( mast within sea area hundards meters to the roughness change line ) than all 6 predicted profile get a obivious improvement .(due to low roughness length change from sea to land 0.00~0.0x , the effect of IBL model can be neglect i think )measured and predict profile very alligned from 30~90m at all masts .do we have any rule of thumb already for determine the sea land roughness change line ?Thanks in advance !
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now